lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: 2.6.7-ck5
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 17:53 +0200, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
    > Con Kolivas wrote:
    > > John Richard Moser wrote:
    > >> When do you think the staircase, batch, and isometric scheduling will
    > >> reach mainline-quality? Do you think you'll be ready to ask Andrew to
    > >> merge it soon, or will it be a while before it's quite ready for that?
    > >
    > >
    > > Well I think they're all ready for prime time now, I just dont think
    > > prime time is ready for it. This is too large a change for mainline 2.6
    > > which keeps -ck in business ;)
    >
    > I don't know whether this was already discussed, but what about adding
    > framework so that (like io-schedulers) the cpu scheduler could be chosen
    > on boot time? This would make it easy to test different cpu schedulers.
    might be a good idea, but i dont think doing such a change in 2.6 is
    good, but for 2.7, a good idea
    >
    > Cheers,
    >
    > Prakash
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.021 / U:36.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site