lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.6.7-ck5
From
Date
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 17:53 +0200, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > John Richard Moser wrote:
> >> When do you think the staircase, batch, and isometric scheduling will
> >> reach mainline-quality? Do you think you'll be ready to ask Andrew to
> >> merge it soon, or will it be a while before it's quite ready for that?
> >
> >
> > Well I think they're all ready for prime time now, I just dont think
> > prime time is ready for it. This is too large a change for mainline 2.6
> > which keeps -ck in business ;)
>
> I don't know whether this was already discussed, but what about adding
> framework so that (like io-schedulers) the cpu scheduler could be chosen
> on boot time? This would make it easy to test different cpu schedulers.
might be a good idea, but i dont think doing such a change in 2.6 is
good, but for 2.7, a good idea
>
> Cheers,
>
> Prakash
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans