On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 11:32, Eric Anholt wrote:
> As long as you don't use the linux-y
> "u32"-type types, BSD should be happy with the changes.

can you explain why u32 would be outlawed? Surely it's trivial to do a
typedef for u32 on BSD for drm ??
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]