Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Date | Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:52:18 -0400 (EDT) | | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | | Subject | [PATCH][2.6] first/next_cpu returns values > NR_CPUS |
| |
The following caused some fireworks whilst merging i386 cpu hotplug.
any_online_cpu(0x2) returns 32 on i386 if we're forced to continue past the only set bit due to the additional find_first_bit in the find_next_bit i386 implementation. Not wanting to change current behaviour in the bitops primitives and since the NR_CPUS thing is a cpumask issue, i've opted to fix next_cpu() and first_cpu() instead.
Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@fsmlabs.com>
Index: linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1-lch/include/linux/cpumask.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1/include/linux/cpumask.h,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1 diff -u -p -B -r1.1.1.1 cpumask.h --- linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1-lch/include/linux/cpumask.h 28 Jul 2004 14:35:22 -0000 1.1.1.1 +++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1-lch/include/linux/cpumask.h 31 Jul 2004 17:57:12 -0000 @@ -207,13 +207,19 @@ static inline void __cpus_shift_left(cpu #define first_cpu(src) __first_cpu(&(src), NR_CPUS) static inline int __first_cpu(const cpumask_t *srcp, int nbits) { - return find_first_bit(srcp->bits, nbits); + int cpu = find_first_bit(srcp->bits, nbits); + if (cpu > NR_CPUS) + cpu = NR_CPUS; + return cpu; }
#define next_cpu(n, src) __next_cpu((n), &(src), NR_CPUS) static inline int __next_cpu(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp, int nbits) { - return find_next_bit(srcp->bits, nbits, n+1); + int cpu = find_next_bit(srcp->bits, nbits, n+1); + if (cpu > NR_CPUS) + cpu = NR_CPUS; + return cpu; }
#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) \ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |