Messages in this thread |  | | From | David Brownell <> | | Subject | Re: Solving suspend-level confusion | | Date | Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:02:12 -0700 |
| |
On Friday 30 July 2004 09:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
> * system-wide suspend level is always passed down (it is more > detailed, and for example IDE driver cares)
This bothers me -- why should a "system" suspend level matter to a device-level suspend call? Seems like if IDE cares, it's probably being given the wrong device-level suspend state, or it needs more information than the target device state.
The problem I'm clear on is with PCI suspend, which some earlier driver model PM changes goofed up. It's trying to pass a system state to driver suspend() methods that are expecting a value appropriate for pci_set_power_state(). You're proposing to fix that by changing the call semantics, while I'd rather just see the call site fixed.
I trust nobody is now disagreeing that's the root cause of several suspend problems ... and I suspect that API changes, to pass enums, should be part of the "real" fix. (As Len has commented, C enums aren't type-safe ... but at least they provide documentation which "u32 state" can't!)
> * if you want to derive Dx state, just use provided inline function to > convert.
If the model is that there's some PM "layer" (for lack of better term) that's in charge of "system suspend" (e.g. to ACPI S3), then I have no qualms saying that layer is responsible for mapping the those states into PCI D-states before calling PCI suspend routines. But we don't really seem to have such a layer. MontaVista has some "DPM" code, distinct from drivers/base/power calls with that TLA, that are one example of such a layer ... allowing multiple power configurations. Not the only way to do it -- but also not quite the limited "laptop into S3 now" kind of model either.
Point being that it should certainly be possible to selectively suspend devices without trying to put the whole system into a different state (just certain devices) ... and also without lying to any device about the system state. (In fact, devices should as a rule not care about system power state, only their own state.) It should be easy for one driver to suspend or resume another one, without any changes to "system" state.
Some specific comments on the patch:
> +enum pci_state { > + D0 = 20, /* For debugging, symbolic constants should be everywhere */ > + D1, > + D2, > + D3hot, > + D3cold > +};
Those would be better as PCI_D0, PCI_D2 etc ... so they're not confused with ACPI_D0, ACPI_D2 etc.
> + > +static inline enum pci_state to_pci_state(enum suspend_state state) > +{ > + switch(state) { > + case RUNTIME_D1: > + return D1; > + case RUNTIME_D2: > + return D2; > + case RUNTIME_D3hot: > + return D3hot; > + case SNAPSHOT: > + case POWERDOWN: > + case RESTART: > + case RUNTIME_D3cold: > + return D3cold; > + default: > + BUG(); > + } > +} > > #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
This stuff, if it's used, belongs in <linux/pci.h> not <linux/pm.h> ... it's not generic to all busses. And pci_set_power_state() should probably be modified to take the enum ... though I don't much like that notion, it'd require changing every driver that actually tries to use the PCI PM calls (since they currently "know" D3hot==3 and D3cold==4).
- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |