lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:02:33 -0700
"Robert White" <rwhite@casabyte.com> wrote:

> 4) Cork-then-uncork would still end up with two syscalls instead of one.

Syscalls are incredible cheap, this is not an argument for not
using cork'ing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.048 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site