Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:37:00 -0700 | From | "David S. Miller" <> | Subject | Re: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY |
| |
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:02:33 -0700 "Robert White" <rwhite@casabyte.com> wrote:
> 4) Cork-then-uncork would still end up with two syscalls instead of one.
Syscalls are incredible cheap, this is not an argument for not using cork'ing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |