Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:16:39 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted |
| |
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 08:50:16PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > please read it first, especially the changes to shmem.c ;)
I read it, and it was obviously still broken.
I got CC direct from Andrew and I read only Andrew's comment and the code, and I could stop reading the code pretty quick since hugetlbfs is at the top and very well visibly broken.
chown on tmpfs and hugetlbfs sounds "interesting" with your approch, I'm looking forward to the next fixed revision. I'm not against per-user myself, but it's not like doing it for transient memory or transient objects associated with the task itself. Furthemore I'm not convinced rlimits should be used for such persistent things that have nothing to do with running tasks but ok, I can live with it if it works.
I tend to believe if something we should use fs_quota in tmpfs and hugetlbfs for such things. That is the place to catch chown etc.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |