Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:10:05 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] IRQ threads |
| |
* Scott Wood <scott@timesys.com> wrote:
> I have attached a patch for implementing IRQ handlers in threads, for > latency-reduction purposes. [...]
i'm wondering about a couple of details. Why were the changes to note_interrupt() necessary? Also, why the enable_irq() change? What do you think about the simpler approach in my patch which keeps the irq masked until the thread runs?
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |