[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Future devfs plans (sorry for previous incomplete message)
    Trent Lloyd <> writes:

    > Wouldn't a possible solution to do this to develop an extension to tmpfs to
    > catch files accessed that don't exist etc and use that in conjuction
    > with udev?

    There is a problem with that scheme. Imagine that a program attempts
    to access a non-existing device. The special fs would call modprobe
    or similar which would load the correct module. Loading this module
    would cause hotplug events upon which udev would create the device
    node. However, all this is asynchronous. The special fs could wait
    for a while for the device to appear, but this doesn't quite look like
    a nice solution. The exit status of modprobe can't be used, since
    even if the module loads perfectly it might not cause the requested
    device to be created. Even if it does, there will be some delay from
    the module being loaded to udev creating the device node, so how long
    should the kernel wait for the device to appear? I haven't thought
    about it further, but I smell races here.

    Måns Rullgård

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.037 / U:32.428 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site