Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:38:13 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: voluntary-preempt I0: sluggish feel |
| |
* Rudo Thomas <rudo@matfyz.cz> wrote:
> I would like to ask whether I should do this. Or is it just the other > way round - renicing the ksoftirqd thread "kills" the effect of > deferred processing?
it is perfectly fine to renice ksoftirqd. Are you running xmms under RT priority? If yes then it will always preempt ksoftirqd.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |