lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: VM Problems in 2.6.7 (Too active OOM Killer)
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 06:13:38PM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote:
>> Any fundamental reason why that should not be possible?

On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:29:16AM -0400, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> of course not, though copying mbytes of data around is expensive, and
> relocation is a low priority compared to allocating ram in the right
> place with heavy imbalances.

The bias is good to have also; when it's possible correctly place
things in advance I like to see that happen. Gracefully recovering
if/when that doesn't work out is all I'd like to have beyond that.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.088 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site