[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.6.6-rc3] gcc-3.4.0 fixes
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I don't see any point where we cast any function pointers to anything
> else.
> We cast data pointers all over the place, but that is actually guaranteed
> to work in C for some "large enough" integer type, and "unsigned long" is
> pretty much it.

It would be nice at some point to switch that to [u]intptr_t, before someone
comes up with 128-bit machines (in other words, no rush whatsoever, but after
seeing Sony build processors with 128-bit integer registers I'm willing to
believe it's just a matter of time...) The other thing about it is that it's
nice to be explicit about the "pointer-sized integerness" of it all.

> And even function pointers should be safeish. The fact that some broken
> architecture (can you say "ia64"?) has totally idiotic calling conventions
> and requires the caller to load the GP value is _their_ problem. The
> architecture will either die or hide the fact that it's being silly. For
> now it's hiding it.
> Repeat after me: practice is more important than theory. A _lot_ more
> important.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.066 / U:2.916 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site