lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] reduce inter-node balancing frequency
Date
Nick, we've had this patch floating around for awhile now and I'm wondering 
what you think. It's needed to boot systems with lots (e.g. 256) nodes, but
could probably be done another way. Do you think we should create a
scheduler domain for every 64 nodes or something? Any other NUMA folks have
thoughts about these values?

Thanks,
Jesse
===== include/linux/sched.h 1.227 vs edited =====
--- 1.227/include/linux/sched.h 2004-07-01 22:23:48 -07:00
+++ edited/include/linux/sched.h 2004-07-15 14:53:50 -07:00
@@ -651,9 +651,9 @@
.span = CPU_MASK_NONE, \
.parent = NULL, \
.groups = NULL, \
- .min_interval = 8, \
- .max_interval = 32, \
- .busy_factor = 32, \
+ .min_interval = 80, \
+ .max_interval = 320, \
+ .busy_factor = 320, \
.imbalance_pct = 125, \
.cache_hot_time = (10*1000000), \
.cache_nice_tries = 1, \
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@
| SD_BALANCE_CLONE \
| SD_WAKE_BALANCE, \
.last_balance = jiffies, \
- .balance_interval = 1, \
+ .balance_interval = 10, \
.nr_balance_failed = 0, \
}
#endif
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans