[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] removal of sync in panic
    On 2004-07-14T17:45:46,
    Christian Borntraeger <> said:

    > I can imagine several changes but I am not sure if this is a problem which
    > must be fixed and which fix is the best.
    > Here are my alternatives:
    > 1. remove sys_sync completely: syslogd and klogd use fsync. No need to help
    > them. Furthermore we have a severe problem which is worth a panic, so we
    > better dont do any I/O.

    I've seen exactly the behaviour you describe and would be inclined to go
    for this option too.

    > 3. Add an
    > if (doing_io())
    > printk(KERN_EMERG "In I/O routine - not syncing\n");
    > check like in_interrupt check. Unfortunately I have no clue how this can be
    > achieved and it looks quite ugly.

    This would also work of course, but as you point out, it's more complex.

    Lars Marowsky-Brée <>

    High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
    SUSE Labs, Research and Development | try again. fail again. fail better.
    SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company \ -- Samuel Beckett

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.020 / U:2.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site