[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: XFS: how to NOT null files on fsck?
    On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:24:11AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:

    > There is another solution - zero blocks when freeing them.


    > (Or put them on a list for later zeroing when the fs isn't busy, in
    > order to kee??????p good performance)

    complicated, doesn't buy as anything, it also means the blocks are
    tied up whilst they are being zeroed (consider a truncated on a
    multi-gb file, fairly common)

    > With this approach you don't need to zero a half-written
    > block after a crash, which means you destroy less data.

    it doesn't zero after a crash, what happens is the blocks never make
    it to disk and the metadata (which did make it to disk) reflects this
    so read returns nulls

    as is, you can truncate a multi-gb file, write over it and the only IO
    you see will be the new data being written out, zeroing in between
    would be horribly pianful

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.021 / U:64.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site