lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > * ismail dönmez <ismail.donmez@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >>>what filesystem are you using?
    >>>
    >>
    >>XFS
    >
    >
    > i've fixed latencies in ext3, i'm not sure how bad XFS is. But 2-3
    > seconds delay is almost impossible to be a true scheduling latency -
    > it's probably IO latency impacting your audio application. (it could
    > also be normal preemption latency, if those tasks are not running as
    > SCHED_FIFO - but 2-3 seconds preemption latency should not be caused by
    > a simple cp -a. This leaves IO latency.).
    >

    But it only skips when using aRts, which points the other way ;)

    If all tasks are using realtime scheduling, then this discounts
    the scheduler from the equation, however I'm not sure if this is
    the case?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:4.023 / U:0.320 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site