Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:57:47 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch |
| |
* Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
> the other bad thing is that there is no point for the sysctl [...]
[snipped another 30 lines of rant]
> > (Note to kernel patch reviewers: the split voluntary_resched type of > > APIs, the feature #ifdefs and runtime flags are temporary and were ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > only introduced to enable easy benchmarking/comparisons. I'll split ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > this up into small pieces once there's testing feedback and actual > > audio users had their say!)
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |