[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Using getpid() often, another way? [was Re: clone() <-> getpid() bug in 2.6?]
    On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 17:38, Russell Leighton wrote:
    > I have a library that creates 2 threads using clone().
    > [NOTE: I can't use pthreads for a variety of reasons, mostly due
    > to the wacky signal handling turns out that using clone() is
    > cleaner for me anyway.]

    a library using clone sounds suspect to me, I can't imagine an app using
    pthreads being able to just use your library as a result. Note also that
    clone() is not a portable interface even within linux architectures.

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.027 / U:50.364 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site