[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Using getpid() often, another way? [was Re: clone() <-> getpid() bug in 2.6?]
On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 17:38, Russell Leighton wrote:
> I have a library that creates 2 threads using clone().
> [NOTE: I can't use pthreads for a variety of reasons, mostly due
> to the wacky signal handling turns out that using clone() is
> cleaner for me anyway.]

a library using clone sounds suspect to me, I can't imagine an app using
pthreads being able to just use your library as a result. Note also that
clone() is not a portable interface even within linux architectures.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.078 / U:2.248 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site