lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation
    William Lee Irwin III writes:
    >> If the marshalling code presents different formats to userspace
    >> depending on BITS_PER_LONG then it's buggy.

    On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
    > No. Read what I wrote: binary compatibility was the very problem I
    > set out to solve, not cause.
    > For a given cpumask_t value, user-space sees the same binary
    > representation irregardless of how you combine 32 or 64-bit
    > user-spaces with 32 or 64-bit kernels.
    > This has all been worked out on x86 and amd64, and the conversion
    > is endian-neutral so e.g. ppc32 on ppc64 should work.

    cpumask_scnprintf() is correct to all appearances... testcase please.


    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.023 / U:60.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site