Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Jun 2004 13:28:19 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation |
| |
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> wrote: > > > > This is patently ridiculous. Make a compat_sched_getaffinity(), and > > likewise for whatever else is copying unsigned long arrays to userspace. > > Did someone say compat_sched_getaffinity? >
aargh! It's back!
> > -- > > Patch from Milton Miller that adds the sched_affinity syscalls into the > compat layer.
There's something about this patch which make me break out in hives. Does it *really* need to be that complicated?
iirc, the last time I looked through this I was unable to convince myself that it was endianness-correct. Is it?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |