lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 22:18:54 -0700
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:

> The "ideal" solution, in my view, would be to have someone with arch
> specific experience in each affected arch code these uses of cpus_addr()
> out, then remove cpus_addr() entirely.
>
> Perhaps I should comment the cpus_addr() definition as 'deprecated'?

I would suggest just making the build fail for these cases.
You could do this by simply doing something like:

#error Assumes cpumask_t is integral type

at the suspect spots.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.194 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site