lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: per-process namespace?
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 17:14, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
    > > The per-process namespace concept comes in handy here except for the
    > > static nature of the namespace. In the sense, any changes to the system
    > > namespace do not reflect in the children namespace.
    >
    > Static?
    >
    > It's not static! It's private, as advertised.

    > It sounds like you're asking (or your customer is asking) for
    > copy-on-write namespaces :)
    >
    Yes! exactly right. A copy-on-write namespace. That way we dont even
    have to invent new interfaces to define maskable mount-points that I
    mentioned earlier.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:5.503 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site