[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: drivers/block/ub.c
    On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 01:06:45PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
    > Hi, guys,
    > I have drafted up an implementation of a USB storage driver as I wish
    > it done (called "ub"). The main goal of the project is to produce a driver
    > which never oopses, and above all, never locks up the machine. To this
    > point I did all my debugging while running X11 and yapping on IRC. If this
    > goal requires to sacrifice performance, so be it. This is how ub differs
    > from the usb-storage.
    > The current usb-storage works quite well on servers where netdump can
    > be brought to bear, but on desktop its debuggability leaves some room
    > for improvement. In all other respects, it is superior to ub. Since
    > characteristics of usb-storage and ub are different I expect them to
    > coexist potentially indefinitely (if ub finds any use at all).
    > Please refer to the attached patch. It is quite raw, for instance the
    > disconnect is not processed at all, although I do have a plan for it.
    > This posting is largely a "release early release often" excercise, as
    > Papa ESR taught us. But you can see the design outline clearly now,
    > I hope, and I'm interested in feedback on that.

    I can't comment on the USB portions, but the rest seems sane to me.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.020 / U:334.408 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site