[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: using gcc built-ins for bitops?
    On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:00:22AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Arjan van de Ven <> wrote:
    > >
    > > gcc 3.4 gained support for several typical bitops as builtin directives.
    > > Using these over inline asm has a few advantages:
    > > * gcc can optimize constants into these better
    > > * gcc can reorder and schedule the code better
    > > * gcc can allocate registers etc better for the code
    > >
    > > The question is if we consider it desirable to go down this road or not. In
    > > order to help that discussion I've attached a patch below that switches the
    > > i386 ffz() function to the gcc builtin version, conditional on gcc having
    > > support for this. Before I go down the road of converting more functions
    > > and/or architectures.... is this worth doing?
    > I guess it depends on the resulting code size and quality. Some extra
    > conversions would be needed for that.

    for ffz() the exact same assembly instructions are generated in the cases I looked at
    (kernel/signal.c); eg no extra code at all.

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.020 / U:35.460 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site