[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [discuss] Re: 32-bit dma allocations on 64-bit platforms
    Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    > why does it fail? note that with the lower_zone_reserve_ratio algorithm I
    > added to 2.4 all dma zone will be reserved for __GFP_DMA allocations so
    > you should have troubles only with 2.6, 2.4 should work fine.
    > So with latest 2.4 it has to fail only if you already allocated 16M with
    > pci_alloc_consistent which sounds unlikely.
    > the fact 2.6 lacks the lower_zone_reserve_ratio algorithm is a different
    > issue, but I'm confortable there's no other possible algorithm to solve
    > this memory balancing problem completely so there's no way around a
    > forward port.
    > well 2.6 has a tiny hack like some older 2.4 that attempts to do what
    > lower_zone_reserve_ratio does, but it's not nearly enough, there's no
    > per-zone-point-of-view watermark in 2.6 etc.. 2.6 actually has a more
    > hardcoded hack for highmem, but the lower_zone_reserve_ratio has
    > absolutely nothing to do with highmem vs lowmem. it's by pure
    > coincidence that it avoids highmem machine to lockup without swap, but
    > the very same problem happens on x86-64 with lowmem vs dma.

    2.6 has the "incremental min" thing. What is wrong with that?
    Though I think it is turned off by default.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.020 / U:1.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site