lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [sundance] Known problems?
Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 15:22, Andre Tomt wrote:
>>FYI;
>>
>>Other than beeing a slow card with mmio-bugs, the only problems I have
>>had with that card was when having a kernel patched with the now defunct
>>and buggy IMQ. Problems were identical.
>
>
> Yeah i know about the MMIO bit, but i never had this problem before...
> Even when loading it with full 100mbit bw (but that was on 2.4).

I have not used the card since around 2.6.4, but it worked fine back
then. Did some performance testing on it, with high data and packets/s
rates, so it did get a fair amount of beating.

> Can't it be to paranoid watchdog timings?
> (Btw, what is IMO, I'd think it meant 'in my opinion' but, heh =))

Not IMO, IMQ, Q as in q ;-)

If you don't know what it is, you most likely aren't using it. I'm not
avare of any distributions having it applied. It's used for combinding
several network packet queues into one for example.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.041 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site