[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: anon-vma mprotect merging-extend fix
    On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > yesterday I got a crash bugreport where this BUG_ON bombed with wine.
    > The problem is that I was not propagating the anon_vma correctly in the
    > extend case of mprotect-merging.

    Thanks a lot for this alert, Andrea, much appreciated.

    Although the 2.6.7 code looks rather different here (vma_merge now does
    all mprotect's merging too), and there's a couple of reasons it's harder
    to see the problem with mainline (because fork's copy_page_range uses the
    quick page_dup_rmap inline, skipping the BUG_ONs in page_add_anon_rmap;
    and because anon_vma_prepare is likely to correct the situation by taking
    anon_vma from neighbouring vma later), I missed exactly the same point
    and we do indeed need a patch for it.

    > This adds another robustness BUG_ON to be sure we switch the PG_anon
    > bitflag only in unmapped pages, and secondly it makes sure not to merge
    > anything if vm_private_data is set on the "other" vma (the one not
    > checked internally in is_mergeable_vma). I considered adding another
    > parameter to is_mergeable_vma, but I think the above is fine too, such
    > construct can be copied as easily without forgetting about the "other"
    > vma private_data.

    I hope you've not found somewhere the vm_private_data change is actually
    needed - because when using that field for the non-linear swapout cursor,
    the test in is_mergeable_vma prevented non-linear merges, it seemed a
    superfluous test to me, and so I simply removed it. I say superfluous
    because those few vmas which set vm_private_data are already prevented
    from merging by VM_SPECIAL flags tests.

    > I didn't have much time to look at the status of mainline in the last
    > week, I assume Hugh will take care of merging this fix in a way that
    > will apply cleanly to mainline.

    That's fine, yes, I've now done the patch, will post it separately now.

    Thanks again,

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.021 / U:0.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site