lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: more files with licenses that aren't GPL-compatible
Date
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 03:57 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> While I don't want to jump into the usual Debian wankfest whether Linux
> as GPL'ed project can distribute hex-images of firmware at all there are
> a few firmware C headers files that have a license statement that aren't
> GPL-compatible at all, namely the keyspan firmware in
> drivers/usb/serial/keyspan*_fw.h with the following license text:

--*snip*--

> Permission is hereby granted for the distribution of this firmware
> image as part of a Linux or other Open Source operating system kernel
> in text or binary form as required.

> This firmware may not be modified and may only be used with
> Keyspan hardware. Distribution and/or Modification of the
> keyspan.c driver which includes this firmware, in whole or in
> part, requires the inclusion of this statement."
> ---------------------------- snip ----------------------------
>
> which makes the kernel as whole unredistributable. A similar license
> was according to Greg also recently granted for
> drivers/usb/misc/emi62_fw_*.h which currently has even worse license
> statements in there.

Unredistributable? Am I mistaken? It says permission is given to redistribute
this piece as part of the linux kernel. You just can't modify it. Although it
is unquestionably not a very permissive license, it's inclusion is not
detrimental to the kernel.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.082 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site