Messages in this thread | | | From | Stuart Young <> | Subject | Re: flush cache range proposal (was Re: ide errors in 7-rc1-mm1 and later) | Date | Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:10:34 +1000 |
| |
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 03:50, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 2) IDENTIFY DEVICE, Word 207, Command set/feature enabled > > bit 15: shall be cleared to zero > bit 14: shall be set to one > bits 13:1: reserved > bits 0: 1 == flush cache (range) enabled > > Word 206: > > If bit 0 is set to one, the mandatory FLUSH CACHE and FLUSH CACHE EXT > commands (if implemented) support the RANGE bit, and user-supplied LBA > and sector count specifying the limits of the cache flush.
Shouldn't that be "Word 207:" up there?
-- Stuart Young (aka Cef) cef-lkml@optusnet.com.au is for LKML and related email only - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |