[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: two patches - request for comments
Andrew Zabolotny wrote:
> No. class_find_device was written for lcd_find_device() and
> backlight_find_device() (framebuffer devices use them). On the other hand,
> the driver that registers the backlight device doesn't have a pointer to the
> class device (well, the lcd_register_device could return it). Since the
> lcd/backlight names are unique anyway, I don't see any problems with that, and
> moreover, it is *registered* by giving it a name, why it should be
> unregistered in a different way?

Typical Linux usage to an item being registered is

ptr = alloc_foo()

It is quite unusual to unregister based on name. Pointers are far more
likely to be unique, and the programmer is far less likely to screw up
the unregister operation.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.062 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site