[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: two patches - request for comments
    Andrew Zabolotny wrote:
    > No. class_find_device was written for lcd_find_device() and
    > backlight_find_device() (framebuffer devices use them). On the other hand,
    > the driver that registers the backlight device doesn't have a pointer to the
    > class device (well, the lcd_register_device could return it). Since the
    > lcd/backlight names are unique anyway, I don't see any problems with that, and
    > moreover, it is *registered* by giving it a name, why it should be
    > unregistered in a different way?

    Typical Linux usage to an item being registered is

    ptr = alloc_foo()

    It is quite unusual to unregister based on name. Pointers are far more
    likely to be unique, and the programmer is far less likely to screw up
    the unregister operation.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.020 / U:8.784 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site