[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Distributions vs kernel development
Stephen Hemminger <> writes:

> After having being burned twice: first by Mandrake and supermount, and
> second by SuSe and reiserfs attributes; are any of the distributions
> committed to making sure that their distribution will run the standard
> kernel? (ie. 2.6.X from When running a non-vendor kernel,
> I need to reasonably expect that the system will boot and all the
> filesystems and standard devices are available. I don't expect every
> startup script to run clean, or every device that has a driver only in
> the vendor kernel to work.

My last slackware install used an unmodified kernel, I don't know if
the latest versions so the same. I run gentoo with vanilla 2.6
kernels. I recently installed a vanilla 2.6 kernel on a redhat9
machine, without any problems (which quite surprised me).

Måns Rullgård

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.099 / U:36.052 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site