Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 May 2004 18:37:24 -0700 (PDT) | From | Phy Prabab <> | Subject | NFS performance 2.4.21 vs 2.6.7-rc2 |
| |
Cross posting to NFS list as well.
Hello,
I have been doing some testing of NFS performance with 2.4.21 and 2.6.7-rc2 (2.6.5 and 2.6.6 as well). I have noticed that 2.4.21 seems to be faster with the same hardware and mount options as noted by iozone (iozone -s 1g -r 1m -o). As well, the amount of CPU power on the server side is higher for the test run under 2.6.7-rc2. Is this known, or have I done something incorrect?
2.4.21:
1048576 1024 46646 60697 814945 845351 844893 24716 845657 106998 845220 44423 60731 811409 841193
2.6.7-rc2: 1048576 1024 42944 48703 536023 546492 543524 23445 537662 83739 544263 188456 259651 538667 537420
I have run the same test against NetApp filers and two different linux file server (2.4.22 and 2.6.7-rc2). The client is a 2x 3.0GHz w/8G RAM, Ge (tg3).
Thank you for your time. Phy
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |