Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 29 May 2004 20:10:39 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for AMD64? |
| |
Andi Kleen wrote: >>We're actually doing the converse of this in the sched-domain >>scheduler. Processes have a tendancy to follow the interrupts >>(ie. try to get onto the same CPU as them). > > > Hmm? I don't see any code in sched-domain that would care about > interrupts. What I'm missing? >
Well no, what I should have said is wakeups. We do the same for all wakeups, so there is nothing interrupt specific you are right. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |