Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 May 2004 17:21:56 +0200 | From | Jörn Engel <> | Subject | Re: 4k stacks in 2.6 |
| |
On Fri, 28 May 2004 01:08:02 +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2004 16:59:35 +0200, > =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> wrote: > > > >Plus the script is wrong sometimes. I have had trouble with sizes > >around 4G or 2G, and never found the time to really figure out what's > >going on. Might be an alloca thing that got misparsed somehow. > > Some code results in negative adjustments to the stack size on exit, > which look like 4G sizes. My script checks for those and ignores them. > /^[89a-f].......$/d;
Ok, looks as if only my script is wrong. Do you know what exactly causes such a negative adjustment?
Jörn
-- Optimizations always bust things, because all optimizations are, in the long haul, a form of cheating, and cheaters eventually get caught. -- Larry Wall - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |