[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: why swap at all?
    On Wed, 26 May 2004 10:23:32 +0100, John Bradford wrote:
    > A run-away process on a server with too much swap can cause it to grind to
    > almost a complete halt, and become almost compltely unresponsive to remote
    > connections.
    > If the total amount of storage is just enough for the tasks the server is
    > expected to deal with, then a run-away process will likely be terminated
    > quickly stopping it from causing the machine to grind to a halt.

    I'm not sure your optimism about the correct (run-away) process being
    terminated is justified. Granted, there are definitely scenarios
    where swapless operation is preferable, but in most circumstances --
    especially workstations as the original poster described -- I'd rather
    minimize the risk of losing data.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.021 / U:0.096 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site