Messages in this thread | | | From | Steven Cole <> | Subject | Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission | Date | Tue, 25 May 2004 09:32:19 -0600 |
| |
On May 25, 2004, at 1:06 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >> explanation part of the patch. That sign-off would be just a single >> line >> at the end (possibly after _other_ peoples sign-offs), saying: >> >> Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.org> > > well this obviously needs to include that you signed off on the DCO and > not some other random piece of paper, and it probably should include > the > DCO revision number you signed off on. > Without the former the Signed-off-by: line is entirely empty afaics, > without the later we're not future proof. > >
How about something like:
DCO 1.0 Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.org>
This new process being "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" should retain the property of being lightweight and not unduly burdensome. This change seems to fall into that category.
Steven
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |