lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: overlaping printk

    * Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

    > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
    > >
    > > i've attached a new patch that does what Andi suggested too -
    > > timestamping of the oopses. This way we will zap no sooner than 10
    > > seconds after the first oops.
    >
    > I think that will do the wrong thing between 23 and 47 days uptime
    > because time_after() will return an incorrect answer.
    >
    > How's this look?

    > + static unsigned long oops_timestamp;
    > +
    > + if (time_after_eq(jiffies, oops_timestamp) &&
    > + !time_after(jiffies, oops_timestamp + 30*HZ))
    > return;
    > +

    looks good to me!

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.029 / U:0.328 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site