Messages in this thread | | | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: arm-lh7a40x IDE support in 2.6.6 | Date | Fri, 14 May 2004 22:25:19 +0200 |
| |
On Friday 14 of May 2004 21:52, Russell King wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:45:51PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Friday 14 of May 2004 19:26, Marc Singer wrote: > > > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:40:04PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > I was just porting my patches killing <asm/arch/ide.h> for > > > > ARM to 2.6.6 when noticed that more work is needed now. :-( > > > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-lh7a40x/ide-lpd7a40x.c > > > > include/asm-arm/arch-lh7a40x/ide.h > > > > > > > > Why it couldn't be done in drivers/ide/arm > > > > (as discussed on linux-ide)? > > > > > > Your response took look enough for me to switch to another job. I > > > haven't yet returned to dealing with this. > > > > Yes, it took too long. > > > > Anyway, pushing non-working code to mainline is a bad thing > > (I can show some proofs for this statement). > > It was a necessary step. To get around this, we're going to ask people > to submit new machine support on a file by file basis, and that's just > not practical, and you can't expect me to be able to track _every_ > _single_ fscking change to the kernel, and pick up every one in a > review.
Nobody expects this but expecting people to try building they patches against latest & greatest kernel before pushing to Linus is sane & practical. -> ask people to submit patches which are buildable.
> There will always be a delay between changes happening between two people > and we have to live with it. Not everyone works on Linus' latest kernel.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |