lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] capabilites, take 2
From
Date
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 11:57, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Thanks -- turning brain back on, SELinux is obviously better than any
> fine-grained capability scheme I can imagine.
>
> So unless anyone convinces me you're wrong, I'll stick with just
> fixing up capabilities to work without making them finer-grained.

Great, thanks. Fixing capabilities to work is definitely useful and
desirable. Significantly expanding them in any manner is a poor use of
limited resources, IMHO; I'd much rather see people work on applying
SELinux to the problem and solving it more effectively for the future.

--
Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
National Security Agency

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.869 / U:0.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site