lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support
From
Date
On Tue, 11 May 2004 17:01:50 PDT, Matt Porter said:
> New OCP infrastructure ported from 2.4 along with several
> enhancements. Please apply.

Big honking patch. Wholesale removal of old code. Wholesale addition of new code.

And this is the closest to a hint of what an OCP in the old code:

- * @device: OCP device such as PCI, GPT, UART, OPB, IIC, GPIO, EMAC, ZMII
- * @dev_num: ocp device number whos paddr you want

And in the new:

+extern struct ocp_def core_ocp[]; /* Static list of devices, provided by
+ CPU core */

And some vendor IDs that say that IBM and FreeScale make them, and Motorola
apparently rebadges/clones Freescale's (or vice versa)..

I'm *guessing* that this is some all-in-one integrated north/south/PCI/east bridge
with an APIC or similar and some I/O controllers.... Or maybe it's a board-level
designator like 'ebony' seems to be.. or something..

It's a UART... or a Bus-level board.. or both.. ;)

arch/ppc/Kconfig says this:
config OCP
bool
depends on IBM_OCP
default y
that leads to arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/Kconfig:
config IBM_OCP
bool
depends on ASH || CPCI405 || EBONY || EP405 || OCOTEA || REDWOOD_5 || REDWOOD_6 || SYCAMOR
E || WALNUT
default y

Grepping for OCP in arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/* isn't informative either..

Color me mystified.. ;)

(Actually, other than the apparent lack of any comment that says what an OCP
in fact is, I didn't see any really big style problems while scrolling through it..)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.071 / U:0.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site