lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.6-mm1
    Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
    >
    > On Mon, 10 May 2004 15:02:03 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
    >
    > > > These two just introduced a subtile behaviour change during stable series,
    > > > possibly (not likely) leading to DoS opportunities from applications running
    > > > as gid 0.
    > >
    > > mlock_group is likely to go away.
    > >
    > > Is an unprivileged user likely to have gid 0? Easy enough to fix, anyway.
    >
    > Equally important, is gid 0 (with its other possible overloadings) something that we
    > want to put on a user just because they have a need for mlock??

    You misread the code. The sysctl, when non-zero, specifies the group which is
    allowed to allocate hugetlb-backed shm segments.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.026 / U:30.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site