Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 1 May 2004 11:19:18 +0200 | From | Tomas Szepe <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license |
| |
On Apr-28 2004, Wed, 01:59 +0200 Robert M. Stockmann <stock@stokkie.net> wrote:
> > > The needed header files, which need to be read by the gcc compiler, contain > > > unnamed and annonymizes structures and unions. In the worst case scenario, > > > only the name of used variables are given and no info about variable type or > > > size are inside these headers files. gcc-2.95.3 fails to succesfully link these > > > > Opaque types have been available FOREVER. > > sure, but can one qualify that as Open Source?
Are you familiar with my friend "void *"?
-- Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |