Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:19:57 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: drivers/char/dz.[ch]: reason for keeping? |
| |
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Russell King wrote: > > > Since we have drivers/serial/dz.[ch] now merged, is there a reason to > > keep drivers/char/dz.[ch] around any more? I notice people keep doing > > cleanups, but this is wasted effort if the driver is superseded by the > > new drivers/serial/dz.[ch] driver. > > drivers/char/dz.[ch] has been verified to work on real hardware, at least > with 2.4. Can the same be said of drivers/serial/dz.[ch]? If so, then > the former can be removed from the mainline.
Ralf has verified that it works before he submitted it to Linus, so I guess that means that it does "work on real hardware".
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |