lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: drivers/char/dz.[ch]: reason for keeping?
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Russell King wrote:
>
> > Since we have drivers/serial/dz.[ch] now merged, is there a reason to
> > keep drivers/char/dz.[ch] around any more? I notice people keep doing
> > cleanups, but this is wasted effort if the driver is superseded by the
> > new drivers/serial/dz.[ch] driver.
>
> drivers/char/dz.[ch] has been verified to work on real hardware, at least
> with 2.4. Can the same be said of drivers/serial/dz.[ch]? If so, then
> the former can be removed from the mainline.

Ralf has verified that it works before he submitted it to Linus, so
I guess that means that it does "work on real hardware".

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.093 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site