Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:59:54 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Process Aggregates (PAGG) support for the 2.6 kernel |
| |
* Rik van Riel (riel@redhat.com) wrote: > On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Still doesn't make a lot of sense. CKRM is a huge cludgy beast poking > > everywhere while PAGG is a really small layer to allow kernel modules > > keeping per-process state. If CKRM gets merged at all (and the current > > looks far to horrible and the gains are rather unclear) it should layer > > ontop of something like PAGG for the functionality covered by it. > > What was the last time you looked at the CKRM source? > > Sure it's a bit bigger than PAGG, but that's also because > it includes the functionality to change the group a process > belongs to and other things that don't seem to be included > in the PAGG patch.
I looked briefly at one of the PAGG modules called job. It contains the grouping functionalities. I suspect that this is something that would be a common need for all users of a resource grouping mechanism.
thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |