[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license

    >Actually, we also have no desire nor purpose to prevent tainting. The purpose
    >of the workaround is to avoid repetitive warning messages generated when
    >multiple modules belonging to a single logical "driver" are loaded (even when
    >a module is only probed but not used due to the hardware not being present).
    >Although the issue may sound trivial/harmless to people on the lkml, it was a
    >frequent cause of confusion for the average person.
    Would it not be better to simply place a notice in the readme explaining
    the error messages mean, rather than working around the liscense checking
    code? Educate the users, rather than fibbing.

    Adam Jaskiewicz

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.020 / U:8.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site