[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] radix priority search tree - objrmap complexity fix
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:22:33AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Well, I doubt anybody could take advantage of this optimization, since
> nobody can ship with hugetlbfs disabled anyways (peraphs with the
> exception of the embedded people but then I doubt they want to risk

Common. stop smoking that bad stuff. Almost non-one except the known
oracle whores SuSE and RH need it. Remeber Linux is used much more widely
except the known "Enterprise" vendors. None of the NAS/networking/media
applicances or pdas I've seen has the slightest need for hugetlbfs.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.102 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site