[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Scheduler balancing statistics
Rick Lindsley wrote:
> From an analysis standpoint it would be nice to know which of
> the major features are being activated for a particular load.
> So imbalance-driven moves, power-driven moves, and the number of
> times each domain tried to balance and failed would all be useful.
> I think your output covered those.
> It doesn't get into the finer points of how the imbalance is derived,
> but maybe it should...
> It's ok to wait and see if those are useful before implementing them. I
> suspect they would be relatively easily added if they were needed.
> One reason there are 6 versions of scheduler statistics is that the
> information needed kept changing, both due to a better understanding of
> bottlenecks and due to changing code.


> Well, every domain that is reported here will cover the entire system
> because it simply takes the sum of statistics from all domains.
> I would suggest creating an output format that gives you all this
> information (since we have it anyway) but I think it is quite reasonable
> for the program which *interprets* this information to summarize it.

OK, yeah that is a fine idea.

> Would you say these would be in addition to the schedstats or
> would these replace them?
> It will replace some of them, I think.
> That's my thought too. I would suggest that we merge them into one patch.
> Much as I'd like to see my schedstats hit the mainline, I think it
> is prudent to separate the major architectural changes sched-domains
> introduces from statistics both related and unrelated to them --
> and having two statistics patches for the scheduler, even if they are
> complementary, makes it harder on Andrew and more confusing for users.

No, I started with your sources, and the plan has always
been to merge my changes back to you where possible.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.034 / U:1.700 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site