lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: CFQ iosched praise: good perfomance and better latency
    Pedro Larroy wrote:
    > Hi
    >
    > I've been trying CFQ ioscheduler in my software raid5 with nice results,
    > I've observed that a latency pattern still exists, just as in the
    > anticipatory ioscheduler, but those spikes are now much lower (from
    > 6ms with AS to 2ms with CFQ as seen in the bottom of
    > http://pedro.larroy.com/devel/iolat/analisys/),
    > plus apps seems to get a fair amount of io so they don't get starved.
    >
    > Seems a good choice for io loaded boxes. Thanks Jens Axboe.
    >

    Although AS isn't at its best when behind raid devices (it should
    probably be in front of them), you could be seeing some problem
    with the raid code.

    I'd be interested to see what the graph looks like with elevator=noop
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.018 / U:7.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site