[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: vmscan.c heuristic adjustment for smaller systems
    On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:33:33PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    >> This doesn't match your first response. Anyway, this one is gets
    >> scrapped. I guess if swappiness solves it, then so much the better.

    On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:52:57PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
    > Huh? Where do you see a discrepency? I don't think I claimed that
    > the test program performance changed. The noticeable difference is in
    > interactivity once the page cache fills. IMHO, 30 seconds to do a
    > file listing on /proc is extreme.

    Oh, sorry, it was unclear to me that the test changed anything but
    swappiness (i.e. I couldn't tell they included the patch etc.)

    -- wli
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.020 / U:3.944 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site