lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: disable-cap-mlock
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:48:25AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:59:20PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > Oracle needs this sysctl, I designed it and Ken Chen implemented it. I
> > guess google also won't dislike it.
> > This is a lot simpler than the mlock rlimit and this is people really
> > need (not the rlimit). The rlimit thing can still be applied on top of
> > this. This should be more efficient too (besides its simplicity).
> > can you apply to mainline?
> > http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.5-rc3-aa1/disable-cap-mlock-1
>
> Something like this would have the minor advantage of zero core impact.
> Testbooted only. vs. 2.6.5-rc3-mm4

I certainly like this too (despite it's more complicated but it might
avoid us to have to add further sysctl in the future), Andrew what do
you prefer to merge? I don't mind either ways.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.178 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site