Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:27:44 +0100 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: objrmap-core-1 (rmap removal for file mappings to avoid 4:4 in <=16G machines) |
| |
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:57:52PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > 'enterprise quality'. My main worry is that we are now at a dozen emails > regarding this topic and you still dont seem to be aware of the severity > of this quality of implementation problem.)
the quality of such objrmap patch is still better than rmap. The DoS thing is doable with vmtruncate too in any kernel out there.
merging objrmap is the first step. Any other effort happens on top of it.
I never said this was finished with objrmap, I said since the first place that it was the building block.
> way. This stuff must not be added (to mainline) until it can take the > load.
mainline is worthless without objrmap even if you don't run into swap, at least with objrmap it works unless you push the machine into swap. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |